College of Languages
Acadimic Debate
Acadimic Debate
Academic Year
:
2023-2024
Semester No.
:
1
Term Autumn (Fall)
1. Instroductory Information
| Module Name | Academic Debate |
| Module Code | |
| Module Type | Bologna System |
| Hours Per Week | Theory (One hour), Practical (One Hour |
| No. of ECTS | |
| Language of Instruction | English |
2. Instructor Information
| Lecturer(s) Name | Agar Fadhil Ali |
| Academic Title | Pending |
| Qualification | Masters in Linguistics |
| Department | English |
| College | Languages |
| Contact Details |
E-mail address: agar.fadhil@nawroz.edu.krd Mobile Number: 0750-412-3144 |
3. Teaching Assistant Information
| TA Name | |
| TA Academic Title | |
| TA Qualification | |
| TA Department | |
| College | |
| TA Contact Details |
4. Module Overview
This module guides students through a comprehensive exploration of academic inquiry, providing tools for confident navigation. It emphasizes refining presentation skills, addressing research intricacies, and fostering critical thinking. Participants develop strategies for source identification, information navigation, and upholding academic integrity. The focus is on personal and professional growth, encouraging meaningful dialogue and embracing diverse perspectives.
5. Module Objective
| MO Code | Module Objectives |
|---|---|
| MO1 | Refine speaking skills for effective oral communication. |
| MO2 | Develop advanced research abilities for compelling arguments. |
| MO3 | Master the art of sourcing and using credible information. |
| MO4 | Acquire academic proficiency in presenting, avoiding plagiarism, and discerning facts from opinions. |
| MO5 | Elevate active listening skills for a nuanced understanding of diverse viewpoints. |
| MO6 | Cultivate group work and problem-solving skills for collaborative debate success. |
6. Learning Outcomes
| Learning Outcome Code | Learning Outcome |
|---|---|
| LO1 | Demonstrate enhanced oral communication proficiency through refined speaking skills, facilitating clear and persuasive expression in academic debate settings. |
| LO2 | Showcase advanced research abilities by effectively locating, analysing, and integrating diverse sources, contributing to the development of compelling arguments. |
| LO3 | Exhibit mastery in sourcing and utilizing credible information, ensuring the use of reliable evidence to support and strengthen debate positions. |
| LO4 | Apply comprehensive academic skills, including effective presentation techniques, plagiarism avoidance, and the ability to differentiate between facts and opinions, fostering a well-rounded and scholarly approach to debating. |
8. Assessment Strategy
| Task(s) | LO of the Assessment Tool | Number | Marks Breakdown | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presentation |
LO1 |
1 | 5 | 5 |
| Reports |
LO1 LO2 |
1 | 5 | 5 |
| Assignments | LO4 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Quizzes | LO4 | 2 | 5 | 10 |
| Projects | LO2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Homework | LO4 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Mid-term Examination |
LO1 LO2 LO4 |
1 | 20 | 20 |
| Final Examination | 1 | 50 | 50 | |
| Others | ||||
| Total 100% | 100 | |||
9. Teaching and Learning Methods
- Lecture
- class discussion
- group presentation
- reports
- projects
10. Module Reading List and References
Core Textbooks/Resources:
1. Areni, G. K.D.& Syafri, F. (2015 ). Critical Thinking in Teaching Writing Book Review Language Circle Journal of Language and Literature Vol. IX/2
2. Bean, John C. (2001). Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Supplemental Textbooks/Resources:
5. https://www.booktrust.org.uk/books-and-reading/tips-and-advice/writing-tips/writing-tips-for-teens/how-to-write-a-book-review/. How to write a book review
6. Gottschalk, Katherine and Keith Hjortshoj (2004). “What Can You Do with Student Writing?” In The Elements of Teaching Writing: A Resource for Instructors in All Disciplines. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
7. Millis, Barbara J. (2002). “Enhancing Learning-and More! Through Collaborative Learning. IDEA Paper 38. The IDEA Center. http://www.theideacenter.org/sites/default/files/Idea_Paper_38.pdf
8. Nilson, Linda. (2003). “Improving Student Peer Feedback.” College Teaching, 51 (1), p. 34-38.
11. Grading Key
| Grade | Range | Grade Point | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 95 - 100 | 4.0 | A+ |
| 90 - <95 | 3.8 | A | |
| Very Good | 85 - <90 | 3.6 | A- |
| 80 - <85 | 3.4 | B+ | |
| Good | 75 - <80 | 3.2 | B |
| 70 - <75 | 3 | B- | |
| Satisfactory | 65 - <70 | 2.8 | C+ |
| 60 - <65 | 2.6 | C | |
| Pass | 55 - <60 | 2.4 | C- |
| 50 - <55 | 2.2 | D | |
| Fail | <50 | 0.0 | F |
12. Module Handbook Approval
| Head of Departmental Scientific Committee | |
|---|---|
| Name | Lazgin Kheder S. Barany |
| Academic Title | Assistant Professor |
| lazgin.barany@nawroz.edu.krd | |
| Date | 02 December 2023 |
| Signature | |